BCSC's Poonian penalties hit by Supreme Court ruling
2024-07-31 19:13 ET - Street Wire
This item is part of Stockwatch's value added news feed and is only available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Here is a sample of this item:
by Mike Caswell
It took many years and many lawyers, but Vancouver promoter Thal Poonian has won a partial legal victory against the B.C. Securities Commission. The Supreme Court of Canada has scaled back a $19-million order that the BCSC imposed against Mr. Poonian and his wife for a 2008 manipulation on the TSX Venture Exchange, finding that $13.5-million in administrative penalties is not collectible. The fines will not survive the couple's pending bankruptcy, the court has ruled.
The ruling comes as part of a case that goes all the way back to 2008. The BCSC pursued the Poonians for the manipulation of OSE Corp., a TSX-V listing that went to $2 amidst prearranged trades. The BCSC found that Mr. Poonian and others made millions selling the stock at inflated prices. The regulator entered orders that resulted in the Poonians owing a combined $19-million in fines and disgorgement.
The BCSC imposed that order in 2014, but has had little success collecting the money, as Mr. Poonian and his wife made an assignment into bankruptcy on April 20, 2018. Their combined debts amounted to $25-million, with nearly all of the money representing their BCSC sanctions and a large tax bill. The claimed that they were "honest but unfortunate debtors" and asked for an absolute discharge, or "fresh start." The BCSC and the Minister of National Revenue opposed their discharge, arguing that the Poonians were unrepentant market manipulators and tax cheats.
The remainder is available to Stockwatch subscribers.
Sign-up for a FREE 30-day Stockwatch subscription and SEE NO ADS
© 2024 Canjex Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reader Comments - Comments are open to paying subscribers of Stockwatch and unmoderated,
although libelous remarks, obscene language and impersonations may be deleted.
Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Stockwatch.
For information regarding Canadian libel law, please view the
University of Ottawa's FAQ regarding Defamation and SLAPPs.
This case seems bizarre. What happened to the $5.5 million in profits? If the Poonians are in bankruptcy, then where did the money go?
Posted by Oh at 2024-08-01 00:39
This case seems bizarre. What happened to the $5.5 million in profits? If the Poonians are in bankruptcy, then where did the money go?
Posted by Oh at 2024-08-01 00:39
This case seems bizarre. What happened to the $5.5 million in profits? If the Poonians are in bankruptcy, then where did the money go?
Posted by Oh at 2024-08-01 00:39
how does a couple in bankruptcy put up a legal fight against the Attorney General of Ontario, the Attorney General of British Columbia, the Attorney General of Saskatchewan, the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals, the Superintendent of Bankruptcy, the Federation of Law Societies of Canada, the Alberta Securities Commission, the Ontario Securities Commission and the Osgoode Investor Protection Clinic and BC Securities Commission?
Posted by Oh at 2024-08-01 00:45
Why write this comment 3 times the money was spent or hidden simple as that
Posted by sequential at 2024-08-01 11:38
"the money was spent or hidden simple as that". In this day and age when the government can track a $10 dollar donation to the Truckers Convey and then shut down their bank acoounts. How can they not track who spent the money or how/where is it hidden? Doesn't make any sense.
Posted by Oh at 2024-08-05 12:21